United Nations Mine Action Service has reported data
from Kosovo for June 1999 to November 2000
indicating that there were 393 injuries from landmines,
of which 28 were women and 103 deaths, including 3
women. A survey carried out in Afghanistan indicated
that 3.6% of victims were women (July 1998), and
figures from Cambodia indicate that 9% of casualties
were female (February 1999). There is also anecdotal
evidence that women tend to pay attention to signs
indicating that a certain area is not safe, while men do
not. The implication is that all information collected on
landmine injuries should be broken down by sex and
age (as is data produced by the UN Mine Action
Service).
•
Designing assistance programmes for victims
of landmine injuries. Programmes to support those
injured by landmines (loss of limbs, blindness, deafness
and other serious disabilities) could benefit by looking
at the following issues:
Who receives immediate assistance? Quick care is
important for saving lives and reducing disability. Are
there biases in who is treated? Is priority given to
military personnel (most often male) while civilian
casualties often take longer to reach medical services?
Who cares for victims of landmines? Are they getting
adequate support? It is often women and girls who care
for the injured immediately following the injury and
provide long-term support. In relation to the longer-term
care implications: “Evidence from Cambodia illustrates
the gender dimension of disability as disabled men
relied on their wives for support, while disabled women
were abandoned by their partners or had difficulty in
finding one.” (ILO, 1998)
What are the gender differences regarding the social
and economic impact of landmine injuries? The loss of
a limb can affect women and men differently. Being an
amputee can affect a woman’s potential marriage
chances. In many cases, married women with
disabilities face immediate divorce and are left with the
sole responsibility for children and the risk of poverty.
While women and men both face enormous obstacles to
earning a living, families devastated by landmine
injuries must face different challenges depending on
whether or not it is a male or female family member
who has been injured.
How can women’s organizations be involved and
strengthened?
In some circumstances women’s
organizations may be the best vehicle to deliver services
to women. There have been examples of international
organizations duplicating services that could have been
provided more effectively through existing local
women’s organizations. If this option is chosen,
however, it is important to ensure that it does not lead to
a further marginalization of women’s interests and
needs.
•
Targeting and designing local mine awareness
campaigns. In order to reach specific populations it
may be more effective explicitly to target women or
men (or girls or boys), rather than the general
population. Different messages and communications
strategies are required to ensure that all people are
aware of the dangers of specific areas. Women’s
organizations may be effective vehicles to communicate
such information.
Mine awareness education can also be part of a DDR
(disarmament, demobilization
and
reintegration)
campaign for ex-combatants. In such cases it is
important to ensure that women and girls have access to
these programmes. If the focus is entirely on former
male combatants, women and girls may not participate
in the mines awareness initiatives. Female instructors
may be needed to reach women and girls in some
situations where it is difficult for men to interact with
women.
•
Designing and implementing humanitarian
mine action/community-based programming around
landmine removal. Recent thinking on community-
based mine action programming has argued for a shift
away from a focus that is primarily technical (how
many mines removed) to an approach more clearly
grounded in socio-economic analysis and criteria. “This
goes back to more basic issues about a general
reorientation of mine action, de-mining in particular,
from being primarily occupied with mines to being
primarily occupied with people.” (Millard & Harpviken,
1999)
•
Understanding the broad implications of
landmines, including non-arable land. Landmines
leave large tracks of agricultural land unusable. This has
implications for farmers - both women and men. It
might be especially important for farmers of subsistence
crops (often women) given the importance of re-
establishing the local food supply. Landmines can also
make collection of firewood and gathering wild
vegetables difficult and dangerous for women.
•
Public support for international anti-
landmine campaigns. Women have been significant
actors in the international campaign against landmines.
Are there ways that the anti-landmine messages could
strengthen women’s participation in this movement (or
draw in more men)? Are there links to the international
women’s movement that could be strengthened to
ensure that women’s voices are heard in campaigns and
international conferences?