This is the html version of the file https://apha.confex.com/apha/141am/webprogram/Handout/Paper288667/Eldoseri_APHA141.pdf. Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.
Intimate Partner Physical Violence Experiences of Saudi Arabian Women
Page 1
Intimate Partner Physical Violence Experiences of Saudi Arabian Women
INTRODUCTION
• To Estimate the incidence rates of IPPVAW in women frequenting PHC’s
• To explore IPPVAW-injuries
• To Analyze the ecological framework factors associated with IPPVAW
METHODS
FREQUENCY OF IPPVAW & IPPVAW ACTS
CONCLUSION
• IPPVAW was prevalent in our study & rates were similar to reported rates in EM
regional studies
• Husband’s-related factors were significantly associated with IPPVAW than those
related to women at all measured levels of the ecological model
• Most women were unemployed (75%) and dependant on husbands, which explained
the significant effect of male dominance in reported IPPVAW
• Most women (80.5%) believed in family privacy, which may explain reluctance to report
IPPVAW-related injuries to healthcare professionals
• Most women did not accept a husband’s right to beat his wife at any given scenario,
except in a wife’s infidelity, where half of the women accepted beating
• Social & Legislative restrictions on women’s autonomy contribute to their risk for
IPPVAW in Saudi Arabia
• PHC services as first-point of contact in a healthcare system are not well-equipped to
respond to women’s needs in cases of IPPVAW
REFERENCES
CONTACTS
Halah M. Eldoseri, PhD, MSc
Health Researcher, National Guards Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
heldo001@gmail.com
Kimberly Adams Tufts, DNP, WHNP-BC, FAAN
Associate Chair & Director of Community & Global Initiatives, School of Nursing
Old Dominion University
ktufts@odu.edu
• Department of Primary Healthcare at the Saudi Ministry of Health
• Dr. Mustafa Al-Shebl, Professor of Statistics, Alexandria University,
mkshebl@yahoo.com
Intimate partner physical violence against women (IPPVAW) is prevalent in the Eastern
Mediterranean (EM) region, ranging between 16% and 52%, compared with 1.3% to
12% in Europe and North America1. The variation observed reflect not only the
difference in methods and data collection but also the difference in the populations
studied. Studies addressing IPPVAW in Saudi Arabia are limited with variable
methodology and definitions used. Prevalence of IPPVAW in primary healthcare clinics
(PHC’s) settings ranged between 17.9% and 25.7% respectively 2, 3. Spousal violence is
embedded in the beliefs on gender roles. The ratio of Saudi men who supported the use
of violence against women in case of misconduct was 52.7%, and 32% of men have
actually used violence against their wives4. Heise (1998) suggested the use of an
integrated, ecological framework to capture multiple levels of variables that influence the
experience of intimate partner violence against women (IPV) (Figure -1-)5.
The Adverse Health Effects of IPPVAW
The health outcomes of IPPVAW are well-documented. Adverse health outcomes of
IPPVAW range from temporary or direct effects to long term or indirect, prolonged
effects6. The long term effects of violence range from lower health status, lower quality
of life, and higher utilization of health services6. Annual increase of healthcare costs was
found to be higher in women with a history of violence compared to women who did
not report violence 7, 8.
Studies in EM region showed that women who were beaten were more likely to have
unwanted or mistimed pregnancies, to commence antenatal care later, and to terminate a
pregnancy. Infant and child mortality rates in children born to abused mothers are
significantly higher compared to the mortality in children of non-abused mothers9-11.
Mental health consequences, injuries, disability and death of abused women are well
documented in several EM studies12-14. In Saudi Arabia, IPPVAW resulted in mild and
severe injuries, ranging from scratches and bruises to abortion and preterm labor 2,3,15.
This study aimed to explore the frequency of IPPVAW, the associated risk factors, and
the adverse health outcomes in Saudi women within PHC’s setting.
Halah M. Eldoseri, PhD, MSc. and Kimberly Adams Tufts, DNP, WHNP-BC, FAAN
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
GENDER ATTITUDES & ACCEPATNCE OF BEATING
FIGURE 1: Ecological Model Factors & IPPVAW
ABSTRACT
RESULTS
OBJECTIVES
PERSONAL FACTORS:
• Husband’s history of a childhood abuse (ρ=0.048), Husband’s alcohol use (ρ≤0.000),
& husband’s drug use (ρ=0.001) were significantly associated with IPPVAW
INTERPERSONAL FACTORS:
• Increased marital conflicts (ρ≤ 0.0000) & male dominance (ρ≤0.000) were
significantly associated with IPPVAW
COMMUNITY-RELATED FACTORS:
• Husband’s unemployment (ρ=0.008) & husbands aggression towards other men
(ρ=0.013) were significantly associated with IPPVAW
SOCIETAL FACTORS:
• Reported IPPVAW did not differ significantly in women based on gender attitudes and
acceptance of physical chastisement.
ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS ASSOSIATED WITH IPPVAW
• Perceived recent pain & discomfort (ρ=0.046), antidepressants use (ρ=0.009) &
suicidal thoughts (ρ≤0.000) were significantly associated with reported IPPVAW
• Women who reported IPPVAW were more likely to report antidepressant use
(OR=11.5) and suicidal thoughts (OR=10.7) than women who did not report IPPVAW
• Among women who reported IPPVAW, 18% sustained IPPVAW-related injuries
• A total of 16% women required medical attention out of 18% of women who
reported IPPVAW
• Only 6.5% of women disclosed to a healthcare professional the cause of injuries
Intimate partner physical violence against women (IPPVAW) is a serious public
health concern with global implications. The Ecological Model provides a
comprehensive framework for the investigation of factors associated with IPPVAW.
Studies addressing IPPVAW in Saudi Arabia are limited and have not explored risk
and protective factors for IPPVAW. Our study aimed to investigate the association
of personal, interpersonal, community, and societal factors with IPPVAW, as well as
perceived health outcomes.
Methods: Cross-sectional study design in six PHC’s in Jeddah city. Convenience
sampling was used to recruit 200 ever-married Saudi women. We used structured
personal interviews to explore IPPVAW-related factors using an adapted version of
WHO VAW survey. Data were analyzed using univariate & bivariate analysis. Chi-
Square, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, & BLR tests were used to measure the
significance of IPPVAW association with the measured factors and adverse health
effects, ρ<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Nearly 46% of women reported IPPVAW, while 18% of those reported
IPPVAW-related injuries. Approximately, half of the women held traditional gender
attitudes and agreed on a husband right to hit his wife in at least one condition.
Husband’s alcohol & drug use, increased marital conflict, male dominance,
husband’s unemployment, and husband’s involvement in physical aggression with
others were significantly associated with reported IPPVAW. Women who reported
IPPVAW were more likely to report increased antidepressants use (OR 11.5) and
more likely to think of suicide (OR 10.7) than women who did not report IPPVAW.
Only 6.5% of women who reported IPPVAW-related injuries disclosed the reason
of their injuries to a healthcare professional.
Conclusion: IPPVAW in Saudi Arabia requires better management in PHC settings
to identify victims of abuse and to improve services provision.
• The Study is cross-sectional, quantitative one in 6 PHC’s
• 200 ever-married Saudi women were included
• Personal, structured interviews were conducted (WHO VAW 9.9 Survey)
• Physical violence construct showed a good reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.82)
• Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square, non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney & Kruskal
Wallis), & BLR test were used to analyze data, ρ ≤ 0.05 was considered significant
1. Krug, E. G., Mercy, J. A., Dahlberg, L. L., & Zwi, A. B. The world report on
violence and health. The Lancet 360 (2002): 1083-1088.
2. Afifi, Z., Al-Muhaideb, N., Hadish, N., Ismail, F., & Al-Qeamy, F. Domestic
violence and its impact on married women's health in Eastern Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Medical Journal 32, (2011): 32, 612-620
3. Tashkandi, A., & Rasheed, F. Wife abuse: a hidden problem. A study among
Saudi women attending PHC centers. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 15(5),
(2009): 1242-1253.
4. Almosaed, N. Violence against women: a cross‐cultural perspective. Journal of
Muslim Minority Affairs, 24, (2004): 67-88.
5. Heise, L. (1998 ). Violence Against women: An integrated, ecological
framework. Violence against Women 4(3). 261-290. Plichta, Stacey B. "Intimate
Partner Violence and Physical Health Consequences Policy and Practice
Implications." Journal of interpersonal violence 19.11 (2004): 1296-1323.
6. Campbell, Doris Williams, et al. "Intimate partner violence in African American
women." Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 7.1 (2002): 5.
7. Rivara, F. P., Anderson, M. L., Fishman, P., Bonomi, A. E., Reid, R. J., Carrell,
D., & Thompson, R. S. Healthcare utilization and costs for women with a
history of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(2),
(2007): 89-96.
8. Wisner, C. L., Gilmer, T. P., Saltzman, L. E., & Zink, T. M. (1999). Intimate
partner violence against women: do victims cost health plans more? The Journal
of Family Practice, 48(6), (1999): 439-443.
9. Usta, J., Farver, J. A. M., & Pashayan, N. Domestic violence: The Lebanese
experience. Public Health, 121(3), (2007): 208-219.
10. Diop-Sidibé, N., Campbell, J. C., & Becker, S. Domestic violence against women
in Egypt--wife beating and health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 62(5),
(2006):1260-1277.
11. Haj-Yahia, M. M. Implications of wife abuse and battering for self-esteem,
depression, and anxiety as revealed by the second Palestinian national survey on
violence against women. Journal of Family Issues, 21(4), (2000): 435-463.
12. Kishor, Sunita, and Kiersten Johnson. Profiling domestic violence: a multi-country
study. MEASURE DHS+, ORC Macro, 2004.
13. Habib, S. R., Abdel Azim, E. K., Fawzy, I. A., Kamal, N. N., & El Sherbini, A.
M. (2011). Prevalence and effects of violence against women in a rural
community in Minia Governorate, Egypt. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56, (2011):
1521-1527.
14. Ammar, N. (2000). In the shadows of the pyramids: Domestic violence in
Egypt. International Review of Victimology, 7, (2000): 29-46.
15. Rachana, C., Suraiya, K., Hisham, A.-S., Abdulaziz, A.-M., & Hai, A. Prevalence
and complications of physical violence during pregnancy. European Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 103 (1), (2002): 26-29.