×

This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

6003
6004

NEW WIKILEAKS! Podesta Emails part seven:thousand more emails... Post what you find below (self.The_Donald)

submitted by mivvan

See also: WIKILEAKS CENTRAL STATION

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786909945350328320 Much of part 7 is already examined by the community in this thread of first responders but people were still asking for this thread so here goes:

TOP LEVEL COMMENTS must contain EMAILID or link to the email, description of contents, please try to limit other discussion as the replies to top level comments. Fresh content, coming from this latest release are only the emails with EMAILID of over 9060 (approximately). This current batch, part seven ends at EMAILID 10249 .

Everything under 9000 is certainly from an earlier batch. So please only post fresh emails in this thread. If you are interested in older emails,see Part 1 ,Part 2 , Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6 , Part 7

  • EMAILID 9290 WJC (Bill Clinton) is doing a paid speech when Hillary's campaign is already in progress. Robby Mook wants the speech cancelled because it will look good, but he knows that's not the answer Hillary wants (too greedy according to mook?) " I know this is not the answer she wants, but I feel very strongly that doing the speech is a mistake--the data are very clear on the potential consequences. It will be three days after she's announced and on her first day in Iowa, where caucus goes have a sharply more negative view of Wall Street than the rest of the electorate. Wall Street ranks first for Iowans among a list of institutions that "take advantage of every day Americans" " https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9290#efmAEgALZ
  • EMAILID 9545 From John Podesta to Cheryl Mills "Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will. " Wasn't Mills one of the people granted immunity by the FBI in the email case? (yes she was) This email strongly implies Barack Obama sent and received emails which were responsive to the subpoena in this case so they are discussing turning them over. Mills wanted to "hold" them, avoiding turning them over. They also talk about contacting the White House to "get them to ask for executive privilege". Very interesting development if they in fact discussed this issue with the WH. That would mean Obama's full involvement in the email scandal/private server issue.
    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545
  • EMAILID 9193 Plans to create an impression that Hillary has small donors to counteract the image that she is bought by people with "huge checks" (she is): "I think it could be powerful to use DipJars to galvanize small $ donations to send a strong message that there is grassroots support for Hillary at a time when she is being painted as a candidate only supported with huge checks." In this second part the use the names of donors that we provide sounds like they are planning to enter fake names as donor info, instead of the names of people who actually donated into the DipJars? Otherwise why should the names "be provided" ? "Last summer, there was concern from the campaign about the inability to capture employer information from the donors. However if you keep the suggested dollar amount low ($20 and below) and use the names of donors that we provide, you could easily ensure that nobody is going beyond the legal limits." https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9193#efmAGsAO-
  • EMAILID 10205 Gonzalo Curiel the totally unbiased judge (who is a member of is a member of a "La Raza" Lawyers Association) is ruling over a case where Trump is sued. Curiel also has a wife who is apparently raving about John Podesta, the campaign manager of Crooked Hillary Clinton. Teresa L. Amott wrote this to Podesta "Carolyn Curiel was just here with a group of Purdue students that visited the debate site. She and I exchanged raves about the two of you." Podesta replies "Wow! Small world." https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10205#efmAC4AFE

  • EMAILID 9272 Email production in response to a congressional subpoena by the Benghazi Committee. State must produce some emails to the committee which will reveal Hillary either deleted or failed to turn over some emails with Sidney Blumenthal. Nick Merrill is colluding with the State Department and wants to discuss with everyone how to best spin this story before it breaks. : "Just spoke to State a little more about this. A few updates. They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper)" They are using friendly journalists at the AP to plant stories that are good for Hillary. The State Department is doing this for Hillary who is a private citizen at this time. "On that last piece, we think it would make sense to work with State and the AP to deploy the below.. It would be good to frame this a little, and frankly to have it break tomorrow when we'll likely be close to or in the midst of a SCOTUS decision taking over the news hyenas." State Department was running everything by the Hillary campaign and colluding with them even before responding to the congressional subpoena. Doesn't look much like regular way of responding to a subpoena. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272#efmA-NA_IBEnBHeBI2BOJBOXBTe

  • EMAILID 10095 This looks highly interesting, transcript of a meeting of Crooked Hillary with BLM activists: "Please note that this was not a public event, so a tight hold on the attached transcript. Thank you all." The transcript shows that Hillary supports the "idea of the legalization" of sex work. Must be another one of those private position, public position cases. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10095

  • EMAILID 7860 This is an oldie but goodie. 2008 primary time against Obama. Podesta, Paul Begala and others are designing a survey, which contains hits, negative facts on Obama that they wanted to spread. Contains such items as: "5 Obama (owe-BAHM-uh) plans to raise taxes by 180 (one hundred and eighty) billion dollars a year to pay for his government-run health care plan" but now Hillary loves Obamacare of course. They also attacked Obama's drug use "15 Obama (owe-BAHM-uh) described his former use of cocaine as using "a little blow." but they were trying to spread this most of all: "7 Obama (owe-BAHM-uh)'s father was a Muslim and Obama grew up among Muslims in the world's most populous Islamic country." So they were actively spreading Obama's Muslim connections, everyone was involved in this, Podesta, Begala and the rest of them. So to put it in terms they might understand: Hillary and these other racists were trying to smear and delegitimize the first black president before he was even elected!! https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7860#efmAQTASM

  • EMAILID 7489 We have another confirmed shill, who pretends to be a journalist at the AP. Her name is Julie Pace, the "White House Correspondent" LOL. She writes to John Podesta about some spin she thought of, and BEGS Podesta for something, anything to back that up. All so she can get people to believe the spin. This is about Crooked Hillary running for POTUS :"The sense I get in talking to people is that it was a long process and something she really went back and forth on in contrast to what people might think about this being an inevitable campaign. But I’m in need of some more detail to back that up. Without that, I fear this is just going to look like a campaign spin job and no one is going to actually believe it." Julie Pace really takes being a shill to the next level. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7489#efmAFzALr

  • EMAILID 9846 Seems in some states the game was rigged against Bernie, months before primary voting ever started. In 2015 September this email assures the Clinton campaign that Bernie or Biden will lose in N.J. for sure. Poor sucker Bernie never had a chance. : "John, Huma, Just had lunch with the Chairman and his top advisor Bill Maer. Both stressed the importance of giving the Chair his reassurances for the captioned . Presently the Chair has given the line to Hillary in 20 of the 21 counties which only assures that Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders will not be a factor in N.J. Also, all of the major city mayors are aligned with us as well. With this being the commitment , I feel that you ,John, as head of the national campaign should discuss the process directly with Chairman Currie. He and his outstanding ,loyal staff , deserve that courtesy. I will be introducing the N.J. STATE COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP /HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT TEAM to the Secretary , Thursday night. They are fully committed . They will proceed with the joint fundraising agreement . John has the support of Cory Booker, Bob Menendez, Bill Pascrell, all of the most critical county chairs, mayors and legislative leaders. We must always agree that respect is mutually beneficial. Let`s wrap this up as we have key fundraisers ready to go." Bernie was cheated against in various ways, he never got the debate questions in advance like Hillary did and yet he still endorsed Crooked. Weak! https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9846#efmACnAFM

top 200 commentsshow 500
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a

[–]anvuuAUS 220 points221 points  (28 children)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10095

HRC SECRET MEETING WITH BLACK LIVES MATTER 27 PAGE ATTACHMENT OF TRANSCRIPT

Please note that this was not a public event, so a tight hold on the attached transcript. Thank you all.

[–]poliphilosophy 94 points95 points  (6 children)

This was also within days of the protesters taking over the stage of a Bernie event.

[–]MeridianBayCaballersMO 27 points28 points  (1 child)

QUESTION Wanted to know if you can commit to some other forum before the election where we can have a conversation. That this cannot be the end of—

HILLARY CLINTON: No, I agree with that 

QUESTION: —what we're talking about.

HILLARY CLINTON: No I agree with that. Yes, hopefully before the general election. Yes, because I think that would be the right time to raise it and draw the contrasts.

She's saying she'll commit to another open forum "before the general election" meaning she'd need to win the primary first.

[–]SnazzyD 13 points14 points  (0 children)

well, it was a done deal all along...

load more comments (4 replies)

    [–]thumbyyy 31 points32 points  (5 children)

    Short summary: Hillary spends most of her talking points pushing for better training for the police towards black people.

    BLM leaders get upset at her answers and keep trying to steer the conversation to how to get funding funneled directly to them and that she needs to change her viewpoint from "training police" to "black people are oppressed". They also not vaguely hint if she doesn't change her language/viewpoint to police being too violent towards black people that they would not be endorsing her.

    [–]Tenzen808USA 24 points25 points  (0 children)

    Now we know why her rhetoric suddenly changed to it's whitey's fault.

    load more comments (4 replies)

      [–]Dinkir9NC 27 points28 points  (6 children)

      God damn she says 'you know' a lot when she's off-script.

      Holy shit they fucking grilled her towards the end.

      load more comments (8 replies)

        [–]raceriotsNC 441 points442 points  (14 children)

        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7489

        Not sure if word of this has made it to you yet, but I’m working on a Hillary Clinton profile that’s going to run after she formally announces her candidacy. I’m trying to delve into how she went about making this decision. The sense I get in talking to people is that it was a long process and something she really went back and forth on – in contrast to what people might think about this being an inevitable campaign. But I’m in need of some more detail to back that up. Without that, I fear this is just going to look like a campaign spin job and no one is going to actually believe it.

        Thank you for Correcting the Record AP, holy shit!

        [–]nicodemus13 155 points156 points  (3 children)

        Haha, holy shit that is marvelous. "Please, John, help me fluff up her bullshit candidacy. Give me something to work with! Anything!"

        [–]PFN78RUS 20 points21 points  (2 children)

        "I'm not sure 'I desire to rule over you earthlings' is gonna fly with the public. Too threatening."

        [–][deleted] 80 points81 points  (2 children)

        Heyyyyyy, don't look here folks, just John Podesta accessing his unsecure blackberry on a Chinese network, surely nothing bad came from that...

        He even knows he's not supposed to do it too, but he does it anyway because he doesn't actually understand why that's a bad thing.

        load more comments (7 replies)

          [–]How_The_Fuk 532 points533 points  (27 children)

          HOW THE FUK IS THIS NOT THE TOP E-MAIL OF THE DAY, AND ALL OVER MAINSTREAM MEDIA? OBSTRUCTION, CONSPIRACY, COLLUSION. ALL IN ONE

          https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272

          Just spoke to State a little more about this. A few updates.

          1. The plan at the moment is for them to do this tomorrow, first thing in the morning.

          2. What that means specifically is that they are going to turn over all the Blumenthal emails to the Committee that they hav along with some other HRC emails that include a slightly broader set of search terms than the original batch. That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn't turn them over. It also includes emails that HRC had that Sid didn't, as Brian noted.

          3. They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it.

          [–]lurkwellmyfriends1776 127 points128 points  (14 children)

          I agree. There is clear admission of guilt, collusion, and duplicity here ... all in one e-mail.

          [–]excited_by_typos 61 points62 points  (8 children)

          Where's Comey? Still in bed?

          [–]yeayeaokRUS 65 points66 points  (4 children)

          Doing whatever weasels do on a Friday morning...

          [–]glorious_kebabCAN 40 points41 points  (1 child)

          Comey - never worked in law enforcement, long time friend of Hillary, presided over HSBC during their money laundering scandals - yeah seems lIke the perfect guy to head the FBI

          [–]anon1moosKEK 25 points26 points  (0 children)

          Don't forget, His brother (who bought a house from him) does CF's taxes, and that he used to be on the board of Lockheed Martin, which is understandably a "CF Partner" whatever that means.

          load more comments (2 replies)

            load more comments (3 replies)

              load more comments (5 replies)

                [–]wow-wuh-woo-wuh 22 points23 points  (0 children)

                This one was mysteriously deleted in original thread

                [–]operationzootedIL 11 points12 points  (1 child)

                Our State dept is corrupt, and the head of the DOJ is corrupt, and the head of the FBI is corrupt, and

                [–]nakedtime313AZ 9 points10 points  (1 child)

                Wow. Yeah this seems like the juiciest email to date.

                load more comments (7 replies)

                  [–][deleted] 442 points443 points  (41 children)

                  From the new wikileaks: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272 EMAILID 9272: HILLARY CAMPAIGN ALLUDES TO CLINTON DELETING EMAILS HERSELF

                  OFF RECORD, if pressed on whether we are essentially admitting the possibility that she deleted some emails...And hey, even if Sid is right and some of these documents were at some point sent to Clinton, this is unremarkable anyway for two key reasons: One, she would have been under no obligation to preserve them since Blumenthal wasn't a government employee.

                  HERE IS THE BIG ONE

                  Just spoke to State a little more about this. A few updates. They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it. On that last piece, we think it would make sense to work with State and the AP to deploy the below.

                  STATE TOLD CLINTON CAMPAIGN HOW IT WAS GOING TO PROCEED AND THEN PLACED A STORY WITH FRIENDLIES AT AP. THIS IS COLLUSION CENTIPEDES

                  EDIT: I HAVE FOUND THE FRIENDLY STORIES PLACED BY MATT LEE AND BRADLEY CLAPPER FOR STATE Story 1: http://archive.is/oJWQo Story 2: http://archive.is/FJf5Q

                  MODS CAN WE PLEASE STICKY INDIVIDUAL THREAD https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57gn3k/state_department_planted_stories_with_friendlies/?st=iu9ym6xr&sh=fee9e366##

                  [–]ParkNeutralCA 98 points99 points  (18 children)

                  "Placing a story" you have to wonder often this is done. It is not right to be providing stories to media or influencing supposed independent debates. This is what countries like Russia do but now we have it here. This is a major issue.

                  [–]Chimaerik 10 points11 points  (5 children)

                  Now we have it here? It's been here for decades, now you realize it.

                  [–]ParkNeutralCA 7 points8 points  (4 children)

                  Any collusion between media and people in power usually is only known about long after it is no longer an issue. I don't think we have ever seen it to this extent before at least in my lifetime. Can you think of something similar to this in the US?

                  [–]Chimaerik 5 points6 points  (3 children)

                  All coverage of wars after Vietnam were products of heavy collusion between media and people in power.

                  To this extent, though? Alright probably not; it's insane now, especially when coupled with the shills paid to influence social media.

                  load more comments (12 replies)

                    [–]gameoverman1983 31 points32 points  (0 children)

                    Look at all the negative Trump stories by Clinton "friendly" Bradley Klapper at AP http://bigstory.ap.org/content/bradley-klapper

                    [–]LowBloodHighEnergyRIRI 29 points30 points  (1 child)

                    So the state is investigating her and leaking info to her at the same time. Seems legal and fair(It's not even close).

                    [–]flyalpha56USA 17 points18 points  (3 children)

                    Archive those links

                    [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

                    Thanks. Done!

                    [–]flyalpha56USA 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                    Awesome. We can't afford having any evidence deleted. Stay nimble

                    [–]lurkwellmyfriends1776 27 points28 points  (2 children)

                    This one should be highlighted in the OP.

                    [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

                    Thank you...Don't know why mods haven't picked up on this. Created a whole new thread and modmailed also

                    load more comments (1 reply)

                      [–]BedriddenSam 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                      Archive those salon links so we don't give the traffic!

                      [–]strongdefenseNY 7 points8 points  (1 child)

                      I think the great Mr. Trey Gowdy would like to see this...

                      load more comments (9 replies)

                        [–][deleted] 564 points565 points  (61 children)

                        From:jordan.baram@gmail.com

                        To: john.podesta@gmail.com

                        Last summer, there was concern from the campaign about the inability to capture employer information from the donors. However if you keep the suggested dollar amount low ($20 and below) and use the names of donors that we provide, you could easily ensure that nobody is going beyond the legal limits.

                        That sounds like they are intentionally subverting campaign finance laws

                        Direct Link (Email 9193)

                        [–]CrookedForPrison20161776 175 points176 points  (8 children)

                        Sounds like? That's exactly what they are plotting.

                        [–][deleted] 133 points134 points  (7 children)

                        But did they intend to push those keyboard keys in that exact order... or was it simple carelessness? THE WORLD WILL NEVER KNOW.

                        [–]CrookedForPrison20161776 55 points56 points  (2 children)

                        MOTIVES UNKNOWN

                        [–]CampellarinoKEK 34 points35 points  (2 children)

                        I don't recall.

                        [–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (1 child)

                        SHORT CIRCUIT

                        load more comments (1 reply)

                          [–]LongLiveEuropeARMY 35 points36 points  (11 children)

                          Are they pairing fake names with the donations?

                          [–][deleted] 57 points58 points  (4 children)

                          I'm trying to figure out how that email could mean anything but exactly that. It sounds like they are laundering big donations through fake smaller ones using false (not real donor) names. It's pure fraud to get around the law.

                          [–]ProtectTheWestDTOM 7 points8 points  (1 child)

                          Bullseye, they're making fake names likes a certain group does on a certain sub

                          load more comments (2 replies)

                            [–]lurkwellmyfriends1776 28 points29 points  (3 children)

                            Looks to me like a way to break up a big donation (ex: a Soros donation) into many small donations by using a list of previous donors.

                            The small donations have far less stringent checks against them - as in you only have to supply a list of names with little to no other info.

                            It's clear subversion of finance law.

                            [–]imamsilata 19 points20 points  (2 children)

                            exactly...

                            Last summer, there was concern from the campaign about the inability to capture employer information from the donors.

                            because they were fake donors without employers

                            However if you keep the suggested dollar amount low ($20 and below) and use the names of donors that we provide

                            use this list of "real donors" for your "fake donations"

                            you could easily ensure that nobody is going beyond the legal limits.

                            nobody will check if they are real or employed

                            [–]CrookedForPrison20161776 13 points14 points  (1 child)

                            My guess? Dead people.

                            [–]brad3378MAGA 71 points72 points  (3 children)

                            THIS NEEDS MORE ATTENTION

                            I googled the name Jordan Baram (alternate spelling "Bar Am") and found a different email address that also ties to John.Podesta@gmail.com. It is jordan.baram@dipjar.com

                            From the Dipjar website: "The Easiest Way to Donate. Nonprofits nationwide are using DipJar to collect one-step cashless donations wherever potential supporters are encountering their cause."

                            I can't link to Wikileaks from work, but here's a google cache of (email 5033)

                            From:jordan.baram@dipjar.com

                            To: john.podesta@gmail.com

                            Date: 2015-07-06 15:52

                            Subject: DipJar for Hillary

                            "Hi John, I am Mae's friend from McKinsey and the co-Founder of DipJar. DipJar enables one-step collection and seamless disbursement of credit/debit card donations. Individuals simply “dip” their credit cards to give a fixed, pre-set amount in its 3G-connected hardware. The platform manages disbursement and display of data to administrators. The company has recently been featured in a front-page New York Times article and dedicated CNN piece. Thanks for passing this along to relevant folks within the campaign, Jordan

                            p.s., we mocked up what we think a custom Hillary DipJar could look like. --

                            Jordan Bar Am

                            VP, Sales and Business Development

                            DipJar Inc m.

                            +1.973.738.9238"*

                            EDIT: The FBI needs to seize Dipjar's records ASAP!

                            EDIT2: The McKinsey reference is to McKinsey & Company. This is the same corrupt consultancy firm recently busted for insider trading and the same one that paid Chelsea Clinton $120,000 right out of college (despite only having a history degree) to do nothing.

                            EDIT3:: I'm still trying to figure out who Mae is. Mae Podesta: Engagment Manager at McKinsey ?

                            [–]convergdMAGA 67 points68 points  (10 children)

                            Do you think fec will investigate? I dont.

                            [–]SweetyMcQ 49 points50 points  (0 children)

                            Surely after all this they will. (They won't)

                            [–]slobzillaMI 27 points28 points  (0 children)

                            Only a Trump administration would try. Look at the guy. We need to get this out by talking to people over and over if we ever want to see it dealt with in our lifetimes. Otherwise, this shit is legal for one party.

                            [–]BasketOfDeplorable 16 points17 points  (0 children)

                            FEC is known for being a paragon of justice in these trying times(They aren't)

                            [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (4 children)

                            The value of the FEC is that EVERY campaign contribution and expenditure is logged. Without the FEC, you'd have to rely on a subpoena to get evidence, and the Hillary camp has shown they're willing to delete information.

                            With the FEC data, there's no chance that it's going to disappear when the evidence is needed. (It's way too risky to falsify data during the campaign if you don't believe you'll be prosecuted, so they Hillary campaign is likely submitting real data to the FEC.)

                            The FEC isn't going to investigate, but they're going to provide the evidence necessary for a prosecution by anyone else (FBI field offices, civil lawsuit, etc.)

                            load more comments (2 replies)

                              [–]globalism_sux 61 points62 points  (8 children)

                              There are literally dozens of examples of this and I have seen zero scrutiny.

                              How can we get this prosecuted?

                              [–]stealthboyVA 72 points73 points  (6 children)

                              How can we get this prosecuted?

                              Not have a corrupt government.

                              [–]globalism_sux 47 points48 points  (5 children)

                              Go on...

                              [–]convergdMAGA 75 points76 points  (2 children)

                              Vote trump.

                              [–]stealthboyVA 18 points19 points  (1 child)

                              Well, think about who would do the investigation and then bring a case forward? FEC, FBI, and then DOJ? They are obviously colluding to make sure Hillary is president, because given the email scandal, according to US Code, she should be in jail or at least prohibited from holding public office. Yet here we are...

                              [–][deleted] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

                              Yes, but when the FBI director adds in his own words that don't exist in the statute, it's super hard to enforce the law.

                              That being said, a few words about FBI director Comey:

                              For those who aren't aware: Comey was on the board of directors for the Swiss HSBC bank that funneled money to Clinton Foundation (and the bank also got in trouble for working with drug cartels). Comey's brother, Peter, works at a law firm that does the Clinton Foundation's taxes.

                              Here's a Guardian news article that admits HSBC bank funneled $81,000,000 to the Clinton Foundation. As for proof of Comey's relationship: it's right in his Wiki page

                              [–]CrookedForPrison20161776 19 points20 points  (0 children)

                              We elect someone who will appoint a director of the FEC, FBI, and DOJ that is interested in justice.

                              [–]formerliberaldemFL 28 points29 points  (2 children)

                              Remember the Guccifer donor list leaks? There was one person who made dozens and dozens and dozens of $20 donations day after day. We commented that it was weird. This is probably why it happened.

                              [–]lurkwellmyfriends1776 25 points26 points  (0 children)

                              Clear subversion of finance law.

                              Dems are treasonous snakes.

                              [–]GrandebaboMAGA 32 points33 points  (1 child)

                              This is exactly what they did in 08 for Obama. They were using gift cards from outside the country and cash in the money and making it look like small donations. I have to do some research and my memory might be just a little bit fuzzy but I will find this article.

                              Edit:

                              Here it is. They got fined bigley for it. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/01/07/obama-campaign-fined-big-for-hiding-donors-keeping-illegal-donations

                              [–]ihatereddit613NJ 14 points15 points  (1 child)

                              Did some digging around, there's a bunch of federal laws and regs requiring $50 dollar donations and up needing names, couldn't find anything lower.

                              I only dug on WestLaw for 15 mins as I'm currently at work.

                              [–]stanleythemanley44TN 7 points8 points  (6 children)

                              Can someone explain this? I don't know anything about campaign finance law.

                              [–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (5 children)

                              Basically, systems are in place to limit donation sizes from any one individual as well as requiring donor information collected from people who donate above a certain size. This email directly talks about funneling that money through "smaller" donations that would avoid federal records keeping requirements - which seems to be a common theme with the Clintons. This email, AT MINIMUM, shows they are conspiring to do this.

                              load more comments (1 reply)

                                [–]nicodemus13 86 points87 points  (10 children)

                                Posted this in the other thread:

                                #9149

                                More media collusion!

                                Here's the Washington Post's White House Bureau Chief, Juliet Eilperin, telling Frank Benenati, White House staffer, to give John Podesta a heads up on an upcoming story she's writing on ethics/lobbyists in the White House. "I don't mention anything specific about the Wyss contract (since I never got a response from you on it), but I do mention that both Wyss and Steyer were CAP donors while he headed the organization. This is just one line, pretty low down in the piece, but I don't want him to be surprised since we never discussed it face-to-face."

                                Later in the email chain, she literally gives them the paragraph from the story mentioning Podesta (who was a lobbyist), asking if they're ok with it and reassuring them, yet again, that she won't be mentioning the "Wyss contract."

                                Pathetic! Also, what the fuck was the Wyss contract and how sweet of a deal, exactly, was it for Podesta? Do your job, damnit!!

                                [–]Dalroc 41 points42 points  (4 children)

                                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hansjörg_Wyss#Environmental_protection

                                In January 2015, a conservative U.S. news site The Daily Caller accused John Podesta, who was at the time an advisor on environmental issues to the Obama administration, of an ethics violation for pushing the advocacy agenda of a former employer, because he had previously received $87,000 as a consulting fee for work he did for Wyss' HJW Foundation in 2013 (that organization was later merged with the Wyss Foundation). It was noted that the Wyss Foundation had previously donated $4 million to the Center for American Progress (CAP), which Podesta founded. According to the High Country News, "nothing ever came of the accusations".

                                More on Wyss:

                                http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/28/exclusive-clinton-donor-deliriously-happy-he-escaped-indictment/

                                http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/three-people-died-in-illegal-human-experiments-carried-out-by-john-podesta-backers-firm/article/2551139

                                The dude is a huge donor to the Clintons and seem to be doing shady business with Podesta and just recently was involved with a scandal where three people died due to one of his companies not following FDA regulations, apparently directly by Wyss' command.

                                [–]nicodemus13 23 points24 points  (2 children)

                                Damn good job, centipede!

                                Haha, no wonder she didn't mention it. Here's a translation for that whole email chain: "Umm, yeah... so I accidentally dug up a little dirt on Podesta while writing this story. But don't worry, I'm not gonna mention it. Unless you really want me to for some reason. But you probably don't. So I'm not gonna mention it. No worries. Had a great time at dinner, by the way!"

                                The state of "journalism" these days.

                                load more comments (1 reply)

                                  load more comments (5 replies)

                                    [–]Swansong_2002 80 points81 points  (25 children)

                                    WEWWWWWW LAD!

                                    HILLARY TO BLM IN PRIVATE MEETING "OPEN" TO DECRIMINALIZING SEX WORK!

                                    http://vesselnews.io/wikileaks-bombshell-hillary-met-privately-blm-said-open-decriminalizing-prostitution/

                                    email: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10095

                                    transcript: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10095

                                    [–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (1 child)

                                    i read through that, they are talking about not putting murderers in prison too

                                    [–]thumbyyy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

                                    A very important issue to Crooked Hillary

                                    [–]wobafett24 22 points23 points  (8 children)

                                    This is more a reflection of BLM insanity and racism. Some questions BLM members have are off the charts of crazy. To be fair to HRC, she doesn't agree to the absolute nonsense to these two questions. Third item is Hillary supporting the idea of decriminalizing SEX WORK

                                    A) "QUESTION: With the police having that be a critical part of safety, that is something that I just do not believe because it's not anything that's been proven. When we have police that are just -- like what the mayor in D.C. is not putting on -- committed to putting 240-plus police officers in black communities, not in communities that are gentrified, but specifically in black communities that have been underserved. And that's the reason why we have a spike in crime. "

                                    HRC: "But I respectfully disagree that there's not a role for good, smart, empathetic policing. I just disagree because I don't know -- I mean, we've been around on this earth for a really long time and there are lots of reasons why people act out or why people do things that harm somebody else. "

                                    B) "QUESTION I think the last thing that I'd like to say is -- just piggy backing on what my sister said, there needs to be a new deal for black people. The New Deal that FDR did, largely and almost wholly, kept out minorities, period, and created a middle class in this country. And that was done by giving houses, giving jobs, subsidies on property tax so that there was this opportunity and this space and this time, decades even, where wealth was built. And then now we're talking about there should be like a bootstrap."

                                    "HILLARY CLINTON: Well, I think if you look at what's possible in the legislative process, I think you have to have formulas that will predominately impact black communities, but you're never going to get anything passed that is only for black communities. "

                                    C) "QUESTION: And so I'm just wondering, what do you think your role would be as president to kind of work on the decriminalization of like black LGBT folks, and specifically around like decriminalization of sex work, decriminalization of marijuana, those things that have historically been used to oppress us."

                                    HILLARY CLINTON: Yeah. You know, first of all, just as I've said before, I just can't even imagine the kind of pressure and the constant anxiety and insecurity that you and so many others live with.

                                    From my perspective we do need to look hard at decriminalizing behavior that is not harmful, that is not leading to violence, and try to figure out how best to do that.

                                    Sitting here today, I can't tell you. I don't know. I haven't --

                                    QUESTION: But do you support it?

                                    HILLARY CLINTON: I support the idea of it. I'm not sure exactly how you would implement it and how -- you know, because remember, most of the laws you're talking about are state and local laws. I mean, the federal government can encourage, can make suggestions, can provide incentives, but most criminal law, most policing, all of the problems that we've been discussing are really controlled at the local and the state level. So you have to have a buy-in by others, not just by the federal government.

                                    Edit: 2016 support of legalization of prostitution - women overwhelming reject the idea of it (50% should be illegal, 30% should be legal). Hillary supports it. GET THIS OUT THERE https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/03/10/prostitution/

                                    load more comments (14 replies)

                                      [–]raceriotsNC 819 points820 points  (127 children)

                                      HOLY FUCKING SHIT! Trump was right about the Judge Curiel thing!

                                      https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10205

                                      Carolyn Curiel was just here with a group of Purdue students that visited the debate site. She and I exchanged raves about the two of you. Also with the group was Richard Norton Smith.

                                      Guess who Carolyn Curiel is!!!!

                                      http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-curiel-trump-remarks-st-0602-20160601-story.html

                                      Carolyn Curiel, a former ambassador to Belize and cousin to Gonzalo, said she's meeting with him this week. She's now executive director of the Purdue Institute for Civic Communication in West Lafayette.

                                      FUCKING INSIDE JOB!

                                      TRUMP WAS RIGHT!

                                      [–][deleted] 39 points40 points  (21 children)

                                      ELI5 on Curiel issue?

                                      [–]globalism_sux 75 points76 points  (15 children)

                                      "Trump says Mexican judge cannot be impartial because of his heritage."

                                      RAYCISSS REEEEEEEE!

                                      [–][deleted] 65 points66 points  (10 children)

                                      (Neglects to mention the judge is part of literally a racist organisation called La Raza)

                                      It's like some guy running to be PM of Israel objecting that Hitler is a judge on one of his cases.

                                      [–]CarLucSteeve 36 points37 points  (0 children)

                                      LA RAZA LITERALLY MEANS : THE RACE

                                      [–]onlyhere4trumpCA 34 points35 points  (6 children)

                                      La Raza believes it can take back California eventually from the US.

                                      [–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

                                      Judging from Socal they're not wrong.

                                      load more comments (5 replies)

                                        load more comments (2 replies)

                                          [–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

                                          Oh right but Clinton goes around the country saying all white people have implicit bias...

                                          [–]stanleythemanley44TN 6 points7 points  (2 children)

                                          Was Gonzalo the judge? I'm confused how this links to that. (didn't follow the story because I assumed it was just another smear story)

                                          [–]LeiloniPA 13 points14 points  (1 child)

                                          Yes Gonzalo was the judge in the Trump University case.

                                          [–][deleted] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

                                          The press was furious at Trump for saying a Mexican judge's heritage had anything to do with his pretty obvious bias. Trump specifically referred to his associations/group in those discussions, but nobody gave a shit about that.

                                          It turns out, the judge overseeing the case of Trump’s business is a lifetime member of the organization that has publicly called Donald Trump a racist and is actively boycotting all of his businesses. That, and his other group claims to not be directly tied to "La Raza", despite it being listed in their "community" links on the side-bar of their website. I made a big write up with more details and direct links.

                                          These new emails are just the icing on the cake to illustrate EXTRA bias.

                                          load more comments (4 replies)

                                            [–]globalism_sux 55 points56 points  (8 children)

                                            Dammit! My school has become a fucking cesspool.

                                            [–]raceriotsNC 27 points28 points  (1 child)

                                            Go call her a cuck.

                                            [–]globalism_sux 21 points22 points  (0 children)

                                            Wish I could...

                                            But I should have said "my alma mater".

                                            [–]slobzillaMI 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                                            Speak up, youngin'!

                                            load more comments (5 replies)

                                              [–][deleted] 66 points67 points  (0 children)

                                              Judge's wife knows Podesta. Podesta head of Hillary campaign. Obvious bias. Trump right.

                                              [–]TrashCatTMUSA 291 points292 points  (49 children)

                                              Trump is so goddamn smart he sees right through all of this corrupt trash

                                              [–]ThrashinuvaMAGA 145 points146 points  (37 children)

                                              I didn't think he was dumb or anything, but it's surprised me just how right he's been all this time.

                                              [–]YottaWatts91 68 points69 points  (3 children)

                                              Everyone could see that Curiel was a biased piece of garbage.

                                              The lawyer who was part of the prosecution was a criminal.

                                              [–]cant_stump_da_trumpKEK 14 points15 points  (0 children)

                                              Time Travel

                                              [–]DeplorableJFL 53 points54 points  (20 children)

                                              You know, Im starting to think her email was so easy to hack that Trump and many others probably saw these emails a long time ago. They say the better ones are still to come. This is awesome! MAGA Obama is a traitor. Paul Ryan is a Democrat. LOCK HER UP!

                                              [–]TheKillectorUSA 49 points50 points  (18 children)

                                              FBI anon claims Trump already has all the emails. And FBI anon has been weirdly on point about a lot of what's been happening.

                                              https://imgur.com/a/lFHx3#lCQGp3M

                                              Link with second thread included: https://i.sli.mg/7O9wgG.png

                                              [–]o0oUSA 17 points18 points  (8 children)

                                              How on Earth would the Gov't even survive if all of this is true? How do you clean up such a mess? Seems like it could be a constitutional crisis of epic proportions (don't ask me how, I just have no idea how this cancer would get purged with out destroying the Country we love so dearly).

                                              load more comments (9 replies)

                                                load more comments (1 reply)

                                                  [–]UnexpectedDubstepCA 9 points10 points  (2 children)

                                                  Yeah, he was really going on about it at the rally yesterday, how he's seen it from the other side and knows how to help squash the corruption.

                                                  [–]NimbleCanuckCAN 6 points7 points  (3 children)

                                                  I dunno. He said we would get tired of winning? Don't know about you, but I certainly am not tired of winning.

                                                  [–]raceriotsNC 9 points10 points  (1 child)

                                                  January 2025 I'll be fresh out of desire to win anymore.

                                                  load more comments (1 reply)

                                                    load more comments (2 replies)

                                                      load more comments (10 replies)

                                                        [–]thebabyseagullUK 61 points62 points  (6 children)

                                                        Get it to trump.

                                                        [–]KnollsitÉIRE 53 points54 points  (5 children)

                                                        Honestly it'd probably be better not to get this one to him. If he brings it up the media will just hammer him for days and days about it and purposely leave out the facts again.

                                                        [–]navarroadonaisMAGA 18 points19 points  (1 child)

                                                        Has he ever been wrong?

                                                        [–]LeiloniPA 9 points10 points  (1 child)

                                                        Wasn't that judge criticized for his involvement with La Raza and Trump's original argument was also that his political views as a member of that group made him biased against Trump?

                                                        [–]killery16 14 points15 points  (0 children)

                                                        Someone look into email id 9625.

                                                        There is a link to the campaign box.com account.

                                                        [–]Hodoski 6 points7 points  (1 child)

                                                        Explain please?

                                                        load more comments (31 replies)

                                                          [–]MicaiahBrowning 67 points68 points  (1 child)

                                                          https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272

                                                          (cross post from the other thread, think you guys are missing why this is a big deal)

                                                          WHY THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN

                                                          The State Department was ...

                                                          • coordinating with the Clinton political campaign
                                                          • colluding with the press to spin it positively
                                                          • doing so BEFORE they released it to AN EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT

                                                          The Clinton campaign was always a step ahead of the committee investigating them. Shameful.

                                                          Just spoke to State a little more about this. A few updates.

                                                          1. The plan at the moment is for them to do this tomorrow, first thing in the morning.

                                                          2. What that means specifically is that they are going to turn over all the Blumenthal emails to the Committee that they hav along with some other HRC emails that include a slightly broader set of search terms than the original batch. That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn't turn them over. It also includes emails that HRC had that Sid didn't, as Brian noted.

                                                          3. They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it.

                                                          On that last piece, we think it would make sense to work with State and the AP to deploy the below. So assuming everyone is in agreement we'll proceed. It would be good to frame this a little, and frankly to have it break tomorrow when we'll likely be close to or in the midst of a SCOTUS decision taking over the news hyenas.

                                                          [–]UnexpectedDubstepCA 50 points51 points  (1 child)

                                                          https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9768

                                                          Why was Podesta involved in deciding where the offices of the CF and it's associated companies would be located?

                                                          [–]no_cuckMAGA 48 points49 points  (2 children)

                                                          https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10235#efmAXCAYe

                                                          "Women's Groups - We cannot put something out proactive here b/c the record just isn't good."

                                                          [–]rantrantranttRUS 13 points14 points  (0 children)

                                                          But, if called, Judy and Marcia are also prepared to say that Hillary fought really hard for changes

                                                          Admitting she has accomplished nothing.

                                                          load more comments (1 reply)

                                                            [–]imamsilata 104 points105 points  (10 children)

                                                            9907 Not sure what's going on here but

                                                            Date: 2012-01-20 21:45

                                                            Subject: Fw: Letter to President Clinton

                                                            This is follow-up to our accomodation of these folks at CGI. As you may recall, this commission is co-chaired by Kagame and Carlos Slim. We'll set a call with the commission chair to discuss further his proposal in this letter to WJC that we do a broadband panel at CGI in September. Thanks, Ami

                                                            carlo slim will pay for the wall

                                                            edit: there are attachments also

                                                            [–]jdovejr1776 58 points59 points  (7 children)

                                                            Uhh..Carlos Slim owns the NY Times.

                                                            [–]ImWithHerpesAUS 64 points65 points  (4 children)

                                                            That's why he's gonna pay for the wall after Trump destroys him in the lawsuit.

                                                            UNDER BUDGET AND AHEAD OF SCHEDULE

                                                            [–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (3 children)

                                                            Did...Did Trump just foretold that Carlos was gonna pay for the wall?

                                                            "Mexico is gonna pay for the wall. They might not know it yet, but they'll pay for it."

                                                            Carlos SlimShady is mexico

                                                            SlimShady is a very rich mexico

                                                            Trump sues SlimShady

                                                            Trump uses money for wall

                                                            [–]ImWithHerpesAUS 9 points10 points  (2 children)

                                                            The God Emperor knows all, KEK wills it.

                                                            [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

                                                            Carlos Slim

                                                            I thought that was a euphemism for Mexico at first

                                                            [–]RoboHillary9000CO 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                                                            He will also pay for Trump's campaign.

                                                            [–]bb0589MAGA 19 points20 points  (1 child)

                                                            Isn't Carlos Slim ties to the CGI a smoking gun? He's donated huge sums of money to the Clinton campaign and $100 million to CGI. We know why NYT has been bashing Mr. Trump the dots have been connected.

                                                            [–][deleted] 137 points138 points  (19 children)

                                                            Wow...

                                                            Might as well call this sub the CIA/FBI. The amount of investigating and connecting the dots is insane.

                                                            [–][deleted] 54 points55 points  (2 children)

                                                            The hive mind works fast. Pretty sure it takes less than 90 minutes to read 1500 emails. A few more hours to summarize though.

                                                            [–]imamsilata 76 points77 points  (9 children)

                                                            we are the fbi now

                                                            [–]WDBJ87 50 points51 points  (6 children)

                                                            We sure as fuck would do a better job

                                                            [–]balmerickPA 49 points50 points  (5 children)

                                                            Nah. The rank-and-file agents did good work on the Clinton case. Their boss sold them out.

                                                            load more comments (2 replies)

                                                              [–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

                                                              What we're really good at: investigating vast amounts of emails

                                                              What we need: summarization, showing how all the emails are connected (splitting into categories, providing context, relationship to news stories and events on the campaign trail, etc.)

                                                              [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                                                              the fbi cant do their job so we have to do it

                                                              load more comments (3 replies)

                                                                [–]RatmanThomasSC 49 points50 points  (15 children)

                                                                What does this mean I wonder?

                                                                https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9081

                                                                Young Turks? Or Turkish people?

                                                                [–]broden 24 points25 points  (5 children)

                                                                Might be the cheeky coup lads

                                                                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%BClen_movement

                                                                Top Turk Erdogan for all his faults might be right that the coup was pressured by outside interests.

                                                                [–]RatmanThomasSC 12 points13 points  (0 children)

                                                                Wow, and date of email is 9/25/15..

                                                                [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

                                                                Erdogan started coup himself so he could solidify powerr

                                                                load more comments (2 replies)

                                                                  load more comments (9 replies)

                                                                    [–]dickbuttzzWI 80 points81 points  (4 children)

                                                                    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10068

                                                                    I'm not their biggest fan
But this does seem shady
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Judd Legum* <jlegum@americanprogress.org>
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Subject: Why?
To: Neera Tanden <ntanden@gmail.com>


 This makes zero sense to me.

 How a super PAC plans to coordinate directly with Hillary Clinton’s
campaign - The Washington Post
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/>

Download <https://twitter.com/download?ref_src=MailTweet-iOS> the Twitter
app

Sent from my iPhone

                                                                    They are admitting here that CTR is pushing the limits and might be illegal

                                                                    [–]BoyZonderman 36 points37 points  (0 children)

                                                                    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9707

                                                                    Talking about her supporting TPP/TPA in March 2015, discussing how she should announce her support.

                                                                    [–]The_Trumpening_VA 30 points31 points  (1 child)

                                                                    Reposting this because it got buried:

                                                                    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10217

                                                                    John McCain Research. A huge 300+ page attachment of all of their oppo research on him, including pages of his vulgar remarks, and stories about his bad temperament. Hypocritical of him to speak out against Trump when he seems like one of the biggest scumbags in Washington.

                                                                    Trump was right about McCain when he said he was "very foul mouthed."

                                                                    [–]ZechiRUS 30 points31 points  (2 children)

                                                                    EMAILID 9545 Reference to this leak

                                                                    Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will.

                                                                     

                                                                    Cheryl Mills is the woman given immunity. She also worked for the Clinton Foundation and the State Department.

                                                                    This could be a big one.. email sent on March 4, 2015. This may show Podesta knowingly trying to get Cheryl to get the company Paul Combetta worked for to remove evidence of Obama on the servers.

                                                                     

                                                                    Timeline of events  

                                                                    March 2, 2015: A New York Times front-page article reveals to the public for the first time that Clinton used a private email account on a private server for all her emails while secretary of state.

                                                                    March 2, 2015: Cheryl Mills has a computer company check on the condition of Clinton’s private server after the media makes Clinton’s use of the server front-page news.

                                                                    March 3, 2015: The House Benghazi Committee requests Clinton should preserve and then hand over all her emails, not just those related to Benghazi.

                                                                    March 3, 2015: (or Shortly Thereafter) The employee (Paul Combetta) who will later delete all of Clinton’s emails is asked about what Clinton emails might be turned over.

                                                                    March 4, 2015: The House Benghazi Committee privately issues two subpoenas to Clinton for her emails.

                                                                    March 8, 2015: Someone deletes email accounts other than Clinton’s from Clinton’s private server.

                                                                    [–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (3 children)

                                                                    HRC wants drivers licenses for illegals. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9778

                                                                    [–]raceriotsNC 27 points28 points  (0 children)

                                                                    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1691

                                                                    Clinton campaign aware of no fewer than 8 upcoming news stories and their contents!

                                                                    [–]DefNotHillDawg 51 points52 points  (1 child)

                                                                    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545

                                                                    Proof Obama knew about her server

                                                                    [–]mapandterritoryTX 24 points25 points  (0 children)

                                                                    https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57gnn3/a_wiki_of_the_wikileaks_post_most_damning_leaks/

                                                                    [–]anvuuAUS 72 points73 points  (11 children)

                                                                    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7860

                                                                    Birther issue resolved.

                                                                    Hillary campaign started it.

                                                                    7 Obama (owe-BAHM-uh)'s father was a Muslim and Obama grew up among Muslims in the world's most populous Islamic country.

                                                                    Referring to Indonesia???

                                                                    [–]dilth98 15 points16 points  (0 children)

                                                                    woah

                                                                    total smoking gun

                                                                    i'm sure CNN will report on this ASAP

                                                                    [–]SweetyMcQ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

                                                                    Bruh! Nice find. Tweet this to Trump! - Email from 2008!

                                                                    load more comments (9 replies)

                                                                      [–]RatmanThomasSC 22 points23 points  (1 child)

                                                                      https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//fileid/9088/2499

                                                                      Copy of Corporate Audit by firm Simpson Thatcher. An example of charitable work from the audit was building Bill's presidential library?!?!? WTF

                                                                      Edit: jenn Reynoso lawyer who did audit gave money to Barack Obama

                                                                      Edit 2: email in question https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9088

                                                                      [–]TJKNapoleonNH 100 points101 points  (14 children)

                                                                      https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9373

                                                                      Post election, Hillary plans to implement a substance abuse policy that would include mandatory annual screenings for children and teenagers for substance abuse violations in contravention of the 4th Amendment. They are sitting on this because they knew it would cause a firestorm.

                                                                      ensuring that we work with pediatricians to be sure that every child and teenager is educated about and screened for substance use disorders as part of their annual doctor’s visit, just as we do for hearing, eyesight, developmental delays and so much more

                                                                      Internally, they knew the problem which is why they filed it away for later use.

                                                                      Democrats are going to have a field day with it. It is also probably unconstitutional violation of 4th amendment, isn't it?

                                                                      Let people know their children are at danger of being treated as criminals, and I can only imagine the nightmares this will cause parents who may be totally innocent.

                                                                      [–]convergdMAGA 22 points23 points  (5 children)

                                                                      Read most.. nowhere in her plan is to cut back on opioid over prescribing.. just screen everyone yearly on forced insurance than put them on an alternative drug.. sad

                                                                      [–]_Donald-Trump_MAGA 33 points34 points  (1 child)

                                                                      Nice. Talking about passing unconstitutional laws before even getting elected.

                                                                      load more comments (6 replies)

                                                                        [–]SweetyMcQ 19 points20 points  (6 children)

                                                                        HOLY CRAP, LOOKS LIKE THEY ARE TRYING TO CONTROL THE INTERNET

                                                                        Email ID:https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9485

                                                                        Summary: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency project 'Memex' is basically making an index search engine to be able to scour the deep web. Looks like they are trying meet Mr. Dan Kaufman to influence him as hes the director of Information Technology behind this tool. Looks like they want to be able to see everything on both the normal internet and onion network.

                                                                        No free speech am I right?

                                                                        [–]DefNotHillDawg 20 points21 points  (1 child)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9598

                                                                        "Here is what we have: Huffington post is doing a story tomorrow "fact checking" the idea that there was a push for a constitutional amendment in 1996, as HRC claimed was true. The piece will essentially say there was not, and will quote Rosen's tweet and Evan Wolfson saying this was not true and was hardly a basis for DOMA to be signed by WJC."

                                                                        Tldr. HuffPo going to lie and publish false claims to support HRC statement

                                                                        [–]TRUMP_MAGA_COAL 18 points19 points  (4 children)

                                                                        The POTUS emails are the smoking gun, NOTHING else matters. This should be our focus for the weekend.

                                                                        https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545

                                                                        [–]SenorKrinkle 17 points18 points  (0 children)

                                                                        Good morning. In less than an hour, autistist from here will join others from around the world. And you will be launching the largest cyber battle in the history of mankind. “Mankind.” That word should have new meaning for all of us today. We can’t be consumed by our petty differences anymore. We will be united in our common interests. Perhaps it’s fate that today is the Fourteenth of October, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom… Not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution… but from annihilation. We are fighting for our right to live. To exist. And should we win the day, the Fourteenth of October will no longer be known as an unimportant day, but as the day the world declared in one voice: We will not go quietly into the night! We will not vanish without a fight! We’re going to live on! We’re going to survive! Today we celebrate our Independence Day!

                                                                        [–]Simi510BTFO 18 points19 points  (0 children)

                                                                        The overall goal is to move the IL primary out of mid March, where they are currently a lifeline to a moderate Republican candidate after the mostly southern Super Tuesday. IL was a key early win for Romney in 12.

                                                                        .

                                                                        The key point is that this is not an Obama ask, but a Hillary ask. And the Clintons won't forget what their friends have done for them. It would be helpful to feel out what path, if any, we have to get them to yes.

                                                                        Asking republicans to vote to change IL primary date

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9388#efmAWoAaB

                                                                        [–]SweetyMcQ 17 points18 points  (1 child)

                                                                        Email ID: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9094

                                                                        "I think it was a strategic error not to fire anyone in health care." 
"And not just people in the agency no one cares about."
"I do think in real life people would have gotten fired a long time ago."

                                                                        LOL They know Obamacare is garbage as fuck, yet can't insult Obama! That's why at the last debate Hillary was all 'We must fix it!' and everyone was pretty much rolling their eyes. Such a double standard...

                                                                        [–]thebabyseagullUK 17 points18 points  (2 children)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8597

                                                                        This one is from Lynn Forester de Rothschild.

                                                                        It is about Elizebeth Warren.

                                                                        She seems pissed that Warren is taking potshots at Hitlery in her speeches.

                                                                        I found this line.

                                                                        I think this blog overstates what Warren was doing, but we need to craft the economic message for Hillary

                                                                        This is a Rothschild saying they craft Hitlerys economic message.

                                                                        Am i wrong?

                                                                        [–]Trump_is_Azor_AhaiUSA 15 points16 points  (1 child)

                                                                        Bill Clinton ordered hatchet jobs on Sanders, Obama. Hillary's former Policy Director Neera Tanden believes Bill gave the "higher up approval" to spread rumors about Obama's cocaine use in 2008, and ordered David Brock to demand Bernie's health records.

                                                                        Also, notice how quickly Podesta backtracked on demanding Sanders' health records. He was "pissed" because he knew it would be foolish to make health an issue, given Dyin' Hillary's fragile state.

                                                                        EmailID: 9572

                                                                        [–]FinalPhilosopher 15 points16 points  (1 child)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9181

                                                                        Talking about encryption, around about the time of the iPhone backdoor story - referring to "her" speaking at an event:

                                                                        She basically said no mandatory back doors last night ("I would not want to go to that point"). In the next paragraph she then said some not-so-great stuff -- about there having to be "some way" to "break into" encrypted content-- but then she again said "a backdoor may be the wrong door." ...

                                                                        THEN IN RESPONSE:

                                                                        But in terms of wanting a way to break in - couldn't we tell tech off the record that she had in mind the malware/key strokes idea (insert malware into a device that you know is a target, to capture keystrokes before they are encrypted). Or that she had in mind really super code breaking by the NSA. But not the backdoor per se?

                                                                        Fuck.

                                                                        [–]GreatDoofusRUS 27 points28 points  (0 children)

                                                                        BREAKING NEWS: According to CNBC reports, Trump is planning on going head to head against Carlos Slim as early as today.

                                                                        I've started a thread here: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57guyp/trump_is_finally_going_head_to_head_against/

                                                                        Please Summarize all relevant Wikileaks emails about Slim there.

                                                                        [–]raceriotsNC 12 points13 points  (0 children)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1292

                                                                        Even more media collusion!

                                                                        We're gave a friendly (Hunter Walker at Business Insider) our statement in full so that it's out there and we'll see what else he asks for. Some talking points are going out to surrogates now.

                                                                        Hunter Walker is a cuck! Let him know!

                                                                        [–]usernameicanrememberAmerica First 10 points11 points  (1 child)

                                                                        admission that Hillary's memory is broken:
                                                                        https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10202

                                                                        [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (2 children)

                                                                        HRC ADMITS CRIME BILL HURT BLACK COMMUNITIES http://m.imgur.com/hADDYgdo

                                                                        https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7489

                                                                        EMAIL ID 10095

                                                                        [–]20-Gauge1776 13 points14 points  (0 children)

                                                                        GUYS, YOU DID IT !!! THE EMAIL ABOUT "HOLDING POTUS EMAILS" MADE IT TO THE FRONT PAGE, MAJOR HEADLINE, OF DRUDGE !!!

                                                                        http://www.drudgereport.com/

                                                                        From there, it's linked to http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/wikileaks-podesta-asks-clintons-lawyer-think-we-should-hold-emails-and

                                                                        We moved it from here, out to Drudge, CNSNEWS, Breitbart, etc. this morning, as soon as you found it !!

                                                                        [–]GodSaveTheTrump 28 points29 points  (1 child)

                                                                        Ok centipedes, I'm going in!

                                                                        [–]TDOTL 10 points11 points  (0 children)

                                                                        DOJ coordination with Clinton camp over emails

                                                                        [DOJ] "...considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it."

                                                                        HRC camp "work with State and the AP to deploy"

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272

                                                                        [–]peenyfacehehe 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10227

                                                                        Summary: https://twitter.com/John_Jay__/status/786941693157343232

                                                                        copy paste from other thread:

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10227

                                                                        Is this the "FOUNDATION DONOR" aka Pay-for-Play guidelines?

                                                                        Read attachment.

                                                                        "II. Contributors with issues of concern

                                                                        For each contributor who raises issues of concern there should be two documents provided: a document providing necessary information on the contributor (detailed below) and a response document. Details of each document:

                                                                        1. Summary document (or “the vet”) a. Name

                                                                        b. Address

                                                                        c. Employer/business affiliation

                                                                        d. Summary of who the contributor is and the issue(s) of concern

                                                                        e. Full text of sources explaining the issues of concern (e.g., news articles, websites, etc.)

                                                                        f. Summary of any issues that present the appearance of potential conflict of interest

                                                                        g. List of other people or organizations who have received contributions

                                                                        h. If the contribution was previously in the public domain (including the source of the disclosure)

                                                                        i. Summary of past connections to the Clintons

                                                                        j. Any other pertinent information

                                                                        1. Response document

                                                                        a. This should include the basic talking points for the public if we are questioned about this contributor.

                                                                        b. It also should include any context or additional information that further explains the circumstances of the donation or contribution.

                                                                        [–]CSR_Enthusiast 11 points12 points  (2 children)

                                                                        CONFIRMED: John Pedesta was in the CIA. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9772

                                                                        The other attendee will be Mike Morell who John knows from his time at the CIA."

                                                                        [–]IMULTRAHARDCORE 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                                                                        Ummm I'm not entirely sure if this is important or not but I think it might maybe possibly be?

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9101

                                                                        This email is from a man named Paul Harstad to John Podesta. In it he talks about a way for Hillary to turn around the Benghazi hearings on Republicans by talking about them wasting money questioning her instead of focusing on smoking and gun deaths. What's interesting is...I think this guy owns a polling company? Harstad Strategic Research. I don't know if he's ever done polling on the election or whether this is perfectly ok or not. Maybe someone else can chime in.

                                                                        Edit: on the companies website it says they helped elect Obama among other Democrats so...maybe nothing shady is going on. I really don't know.

                                                                        [–]imfineny 6 points7 points  (0 children)

                                                                        Grass roots support for Hillary? Are they fucking serious? They pay people to attend their events!

                                                                        [–]DefNotHillDawg 7 points8 points  (1 child)

                                                                        Vice looking to help Podesta "In any way they can" https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4316

                                                                        Why doesnt Hillary turn the server over to a third party? (Staffers believe the FBI will leak the emails) https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4697

                                                                        Hillary not allowed to side with Apple on security issues https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4381

                                                                        GOP debate moderator privately emailing Podesta post-debate https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4303

                                                                        Head of Yahoo news planning pro-Hillary pieces with Podesta https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4836

                                                                        Obama requesting that people's profiles be scrubbed from a website https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4632

                                                                        Top Secret Emails Include Drone Talk https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5194

                                                                        [–]JLR-NAVY 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                                                                        Comparing the Benghazi deaths to deaths by smoking?

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9101

                                                                        Stay classy Georgetown

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9223

                                                                        Why the hurry to NH?

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9675

                                                                        [–]archmcdWA 10 points11 points  (0 children)

                                                                        deleted What is this?

                                                                        [–]Iggy0075USA 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                                                                        Removed????????

                                                                        [–]LagahanIRL 10 points11 points  (0 children)

                                                                        There's some fuckery afoot here. Spez stepping in again?

                                                                        [–]bohlah00 15 points16 points  (1 child)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272#efmBI2BOJ

                                                                        From Nick Merrill in Clinton team, briefing every one of the emails cover up plan

                                                                        They (State) do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it.

                                                                        [–]The_Trumpening_VA 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10156

                                                                        "Would be good to figure out the best way to do that in order to get attention to it and get political credit with the unions."

                                                                        [–]Kuhnraad 6 points7 points  (3 children)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9417 Michael J. Sacks from GCM Grosvenor congratulates Podesta on "getting something done" and "let's nog make it so close next time :)"...

                                                                        after some googling on the email date:

                                                                        On March 16, 2016, President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Antonin Scalia on February 13.

                                                                        [–]Captain-Slug 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                                                                        John Podesta acted as the temporary Chairman of the Clinton Foundation when Bruce Lindsey was sick.

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9153

                                                                        Dear Foundation Staff:

                                                                        First, I want to thank all of you for the well wishes for my swift

                                                                        recovery. I am getting better and I am looking forward to being back in the

                                                                        office.

                                                                        Until I am able to return to the office full-time, the President and I have

                                                                        asked John Podesta to serve as a special advisor to support me and the

                                                                        Foundation staff in our work. He has graciously agreed to be available by

                                                                        phone and email, as well as to be in the office periodically, to help

                                                                        provide leadership. Please seek his guidance and decision-making as

                                                                        necessary to ensure the work of the Foundation continues apace while I am

                                                                        out.

                                                                        [–]Captain-Slug 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                                                                        In this e-mail they outline that they are aware of the donation limits for PAC contributions as well as solicitation limits.

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2372

                                                                        · Like the Obama campaign did in the 2012 election, the Clinton

                                                                        campaign will support Priorities USA as is appropriate under the law.

                                                                        · Campaign officials, including the candidate may, from time to

                                                                        time, attend, speak at or be featured guests at their events.

                                                                        **No one with the campaign will solicit more than the federal

                                                                        limit ($5,000) for Priorities USA, as permitted by law.**

                                                                        But in this e-mail they list many individuals that were solicited to exceed this amount within individual months that overlap with the existence of Hillary's campaign PAC. Need to find corroboration that members of Hillary's PAC were in attendance at this event.

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7951

                                                                        Trey Beck

                                                                        Trey Beck met with Paul Begala and Rafi Jafri in June 2015.

                                                                        Trey contributed $50,000 this month (July 2015) to Priorities.

                                                                        He gave $100k to Priorities in 2012.

                                                                        Mike Roberts

                                                                        Mike attended the meet-and-greet event in Little Rock on Wednesday, August 19th.

                                                                        Mike wrote a check on the spot for $50,000 and is willing to help organize

                                                                        Here are the Federal Contribution limits

                                                                        https://www.hklaw.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Practices/PoliticalLaw/20152016_FECContributionLimits.pdf

                                                                        Rafi Jafri is a fundraiser for "Ready for Hillary" and has been since 2013

                                                                        [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                                                                        EMAILID 7524 Nothing to see here, just Hillary Clinton's campaign discussing "Earned Media" and how to "place a story" with "friendly" journalists, especially those who have a history with painting Hillary Clinton in a good light. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7524

                                                                        Earned Media/Next Steps January 2015 Objective: As media attention increasingly turns to 2016 and Secretary Clinton continues to move towards a decision, we want to be proactive in shaping a public narrative that does three things:

                                                                        1) Explains on our own terms who she's meeting and talking with, both in terms of potential campaign hires and policy advisors. She's casting a wide net, looking for the best talent, and listening to people with bold ideas from across the party. Notably, she is specifically reaching out to progressive policy experts and to people in the Obama orbit, demonstrating that she is doing things differently this time. She will be positioned to run a thoughtful, successful, forward-looking and technological advanced campaign, should she decide to run.

                                                                        2) Provides cover and context for recruiting the best people and appealing to those who are looking for signals about whether this is something that they want to be a part of.

                                                                        3) Begins to build energy and enthusiasm among Democrats for a forward-looking potential candidacy that will offer a bold vision for the future. Placing a Story: As discussed on our call, we are all in agreement that the time is right place a story with a friendly journalist in the coming days that positions us a little more transparently while achieving the above goals.

                                                                        Who: For something like this, especially in the absence of us teasing things out to others, we feel that it's important to go with what is safe and what has worked in the past, and to a publication that will reach industry people for recruitment purposes. We have has a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed. While we should have a larger conversation in the near future about a broader strategy for reengaging the beat press that covers HRC, for this we think we can achieve our objective and do the most shaping by going to Maggie.

                                                                        What: Mechanically, the story will have three basic components. First, a list of names that we agree upon beforehand that we will give to a reporter on background, both policy people and campaign people. Second, some information provided on background that explains what is happening and why and third, a quote on-the-record that affirms all of this in an official capacity, making clear that this is a sanctioned story.

                                                                        [–]SweetyMcQ 7 points8 points  (4 children)

                                                                        THIS IS TERRIFYING

                                                                        Email ID: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9181

                                                                        I honestly can't tell exactly whats happening here...it looks (to me) like they are trying to work with tech companies to set up a backdoor malware/keylogger to get backdoors into certain things...also looks like they are trying to encrypt protect their own stuff to prevent stuff like the wikileaks hack from happening.

                                                                        Like holy fuck am I reading this right guys?

                                                                        [–]KazarakOfKarDTOM 7 points8 points  (1 child)

                                                                        If all of these leaks do anything to the average non awakened voter in America I hope it at least shows the level of downright collusion between the Democratic Party Establishment and the Media. They literally I mean literally control most of the main stream media. Beyond that the level of questionable, possible criminal collusion between the state department of HRC's campaign during the investigation is sickening.

                                                                        I'd love to see a smoking gun proving the FBI was talking to HRC's people behind the scenes but I have a feeling they are probably more careful than that.

                                                                        [–]Rancel21342MA 7 points8 points  (6 children)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7860 Clinton Campaign plotting attack against Obama because "his father is a Muslim". This needs to be tweeted out everywhere. This could b the biggest blow to the Clinton Camp to come out so far. This needs to be posted everywhere

                                                                        [–]jenhbrooklynBrooklynpede 8 points9 points  (4 children)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9388

                                                                        I.JUST.CAN'T.BELIEVE.THIS.SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                                                        [–]balmerickPA 6 points7 points  (2 children)

                                                                        what the fuck is going on. /u/OhSnapYouGotServed , the people demand an answer.

                                                                        [–]SlothB77DTOM 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                                                                        https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545

                                                                        Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will.

                                                                        same day trey gowdy issues his subpoena.

                                                                        load more comments (283 replies)